The Volvo VT does 37.8 mpg combined (37.1 city, 40.7 highway), which works out to about $1,016 a year in fuel at $3.20 a gallon and 12,000 miles. Engine choice matters more than you'd think: Electric does 98.6 mpg while 3L 6-cyl does 21.3 — a difference of $1,414 a year. Against other 5-cyl cars it sits above the average of 21.9 mpg.
Every Volvo VT engine, compared
Picking the right version of the same car often saves more fuel than picking a different car altogether. Yearly cost assumes 12,000 miles at $3.20 a gallon.
| Engine | Combined | City / Highway | Years | Fuel per year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric | 108.4 / 89.2 | 2022–2026 | $389 | |
| 2L 4-cyl | 21.8 / 31.8 | 2016–2021 | $1,506 | |
| 2.4L 5-cyl | 20 / 28 | 2008–2008 | $1,670 | |
| 2.5L 5-cyl | 19.7 / 28.4 | 2005–2016 | $1,692 | |
| 3L 6-cyl | 18.3 / 26.7 | 2014–2016 | $1,803 |
What that actually costs
Miles per gallon is an abstraction; the fuel bill is not. Here it is in money, at 12,000 miles a year and $3.20 a gallon.
| Measure | Value |
|---|---|
| Cost per mile | $0.085 |
| Fuel per year | $1,016 |
| Fuel over five years | $5,080 |
| Against other 5-cyl cars | −$737 a year |
| EPA's own estimate | $2,533 a year |
City or highway — who is this car for
The gap between city and highway figures tells you whom the car suits. A wide gap punishes stop-and-start traffic; a narrow one means the car doesn't care where you drive it.
| Measure | Value | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| City | 37.1 mpg | $1,035 a year if you only drive in town |
| Highway | 40.7 mpg | $943 a year if you mostly commute |
| Gap | +3.6 mpg (10%) | Narrow — equally happy either way |
How the VT changed over the years
Combined figure by model year. Jumps usually mark a new generation or a new engine; dips often mean a heavier body or added all-wheel drive.
| Model year | Combined | City / Highway | Engines offered | Fuel per year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 118 / 95 | 1 | $362 | |
| 2025 | 118 / 95 | 1 | $362 | |
| 2024 | 118 / 96 | 1 | $359 | |
| 2023 | 94 / 80 | 1 | $441 | |
| 2022 | 94 / 80 | 1 | $441 | |
| 2021 | 22 / 33 | 1 | $1,477 | |
| 2020 | 21 / 32 | 1 | $1,536 | |
| 2019 | 21 / 32 | 1 | $1,536 | |
| 2018 | 22 / 32 | 1 | $1,477 | |
| 2017 | 23 / 31 | 1 | $1,477 | |
| 2016 | 20 / 28.7 | 3 | $1,670 | |
| 2015 | 19.5 / 28 | 2 | $1,707 | |
| 2014 | 19 / 27 | 2 | $1,745 | |
| 2013 | 21 / 30 | 1 | $1,600 | |
| 2012 | 21 / 30 | 1 | $1,600 | |
| 2011 | 21 / 30 | 1 | $1,600 | |
| 2010 | 21 / 30 | 1 | $1,600 | |
| 2009 | 19 / 28 | 1 | $1,670 | |
| 2008 | 20 / 28 | 1 | $1,670 | |
| 2007 | 18 / 27 | 1 | $1,829 | |
| 2006 | 18 / 27 | 1 | $1,829 | |
| 2005 | 18 / 25 | 1 | $1,920 |
MPG is a number. Dollars per year is the answer.
- Fuel profile built from your actual mileage and local prices
- Fuel tracker: what you really spend, month by month
- Insurance and fuel folded into 5-year cost to own
- Compare any two cars on total cost, not sticker price
- No ads, no tracking — and much more
How we count
Fuel-economy figures come from EPA fueleconomy.gov — the same laboratory numbers printed on the window sticker. We don't adjust them; real-world consumption depends on how and where you drive.
What we add is money. Yearly cost assumes 12,000 miles at $3.20 a gallon — change either and the ranking stays, only the size of the bill moves. Cost per mile is the same figure divided out, useful when comparing a commute against a weekend car.
Frequently asked questions
What mpg does the Volvo VT get?
37.8 mpg combined on average — 37.1 in the city and 40.7 on the highway, per EPA ratings across 2005–2026.
How much does a Volvo VT cost in fuel per year?
About $1,016 at 12,000 miles and $3.20 a gallon — roughly $5,080 over five years, or 0.085 dollars a mile.
Which VT engine is the most economical?
The Electric at 98.6 mpg, against 21.3 for the 3L 6-cyl — a difference of about $1,414 a year.
Is the VT good on fuel compared with similar cars?
Against other 5-cyl cars it sits above the average of 21.9 mpg, computed across 390 ratings.
Are these real-world figures?
No — they are EPA laboratory ratings, the same ones on the window sticker. Real consumption depends on driving style, terrain, load and weather, and is typically a little worse.